Today, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear arguments today on the awful Friedrichs case (see The Best Resources On The Awful Friedrichs Case).
Here’s an excerpt from a story appearing at NPR:
Today, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear arguments today on the awful Friedrichs case (see The Best Resources On The Awful Friedrichs Case).
Here’s an excerpt from a story appearing at NPR:
I think that the analogy is skewed. It is more like a fourth person being asked to pay even though he did not attend the meal. The teachers who are suing are upset that they are being forced to pay for political activities that they do not agree with. If unions only engaged in collective bargaining, then the analogy might hold. But since they also donate huge sums to political campaigns, they are overstepping their boundaries.
Calling them “fair share” fees does not mean that they are actually fair. Just like calling it the “affordable care act” does not mean that it is actually affordable.