More and more attention is being paid to the advantages and disadvantages of reading digital texts compared to texts on paper.
Here is a beginning list of articles exploring this question. Please feel free to contribute more:
I ran a two-part series on this question at my Education Week Teacher column:
Daniel Willingham, Kristin Ziemke, Lester Laminack and Kimberly Carraway explore that topic of reading digitally compared to reading on paper in this post.
Katie Keier, Stacy Nockowitz, Barbara Paciotti and many readers share their thoughts on the debate between reading digitally or on paper.
The Reading Brain in the Digital Age: The Science of Paper versus Screens is from Scientific American.
Books vs. e-books: The science behind the best way to read is from CBS News.
Why Digital Reading Is No Substitute for Print is from The New Republic.
Why digital natives prefer reading in print. Yes, you read that right. is from The Washington Post.
The case against e-readers: Why reading paper books is better for your mind. is from The Washington Post.
— The New York Times (@nytimes) September 3, 2016
— MindShift (@MindShiftKQED) September 1, 2016
What We Still Don’t Know About Digital Reading is from Ed Week.
Digital Text is Changing How Kids Read—Just Not in the Way That You Think is from MindShift.
Skim reading is the new normal. The effect on society is profound appeared in The Guardian.
A new study titled Don’t throw away your printed books: A meta-analysis on the effects of reading media on reading comprehension (that is not behind a paywall!) finds that that reading comprehension is better with print rather than digital text.
Why Generation Z Learners Prefer YouTube Lessons Over Printed Books is from Ed Week.
Is Comprehension Better with Digital Text? is by Timothy Shanahan.
Printed vs digital text: A meta-analysis is a new study on the topic.
Evidence increases for reading on paper instead of screens is from The Hechinger Report.