Larry Ferlazzo’s Websites of the Day…

…For Teaching ELL, ESL, & EFL

February 28, 2013
by Larry Ferlazzo
1 Comment

Learning Another Language Makes Your Brain Grow Bigger — Literally

Here’s news from Scientific American:

Learning a new language can grow one’s perspective. Now scientists find that learning languages grows parts of the brain.

Scientists studied the brains of students in the Swedish Armed Forces Interpreter Academy, who are required to learn new languages at an alarmingly fast rate. Many must become fluent in Arabic, Russian and the Persian dialect Dari in just 13 months. The researchers compared the brains of these students to the brains of medical students who also have to learn a tremendous amount in a very short period of time, but without the focus on languages.

The brains of the language learners exhibited significant new growth in the hippocampus and in parts of the cerebral cortex. The medical students’ brains showed no observed growth.

I’m adding this info to The Best Resources For Showing Students That They Make Their Brain Stronger By Learning and to The Best Resources For Learning The Advantages To Being Bilingual.

Print Friendly

February 28, 2013
by Larry Ferlazzo
1 Comment

“The High Cost Of Rudeness”

I have a chapter in my new book, Self-Driven Learning, that includes lesson plans and strategies to deal with rudeness in class.  It focuses a lot on how just seeing rude behavior being done to another person affects you.

In additions, I’ve posted The Best Ways To Deal With Rudeness In Class.

Here’s an interesting quote from a researcher and author on how rudeness affects people — whether it’s directed at them or they just witness it (it appeared in The Harvard Business Review):

So one of the things that we found in a series of experiments– so consistently found– was that people that experience, or even witness incivility, literally, it shuts their cognitive functioning down, and they don’t process things as well.

So, for example, they’re not able to remember things as well. And they’re far less creative. And so consistently we see that people just don’t process as well immediately after this. And that there are costs as a result.

Print Friendly

February 20, 2013
by Larry Ferlazzo
0 comments

More On The Importance Of Sleep For Teens

Here are the newest additions to The Best Resources For Helping Teens Learn About The Importance Of Sleep:

Sleep is More Important than Food is from The Harvard Business Review.

Sleep Stealers: What’s Keeping Children From Getting Enough Shut-Eye? is from TIME.

Bright Screens Could Delay Bedtime is from Scientific American.

Why Sleeping May Be More Important Than Studying is from Mind Shift.

LBUSD’s proposed later school start times may boost achievement, research shows is from a Florida newspaper.

Print Friendly

February 19, 2013
by Larry Ferlazzo
0 comments

Study: Self-Esteem Activity Helps Latino Students, Too

Three years ago I wrote a blog post about a simple writing exercise for self-esteem resulted in higher academic achievement for African-American students. There was no reason to think it wouldn’t be effective for all students, and I included an expanded lesson plan in my book, Helping Students Motivate Themselves.

Now, the same researchers did the same activity with Latino students, and found similar improvements. You can read more about it at Lesli Maxwell’s Learning The Language blog at Education Week.

Print Friendly

February 19, 2013
by Larry Ferlazzo
0 comments

Study: More Power Equals More Self-Control & Less Power Equals — You Guessed It!

A new study finds that the more power people feel they have, the more self-control they exhibit. Researchers:

…speculated that power holders may be willing to wait for the larger rewards because they feel more connected with their future selves, a consequence of experiencing less uncertainty about their futures along with an increased tendency to see the big picture.

This is just more evidence backing up recommendations I make here and in my books to share power with students in the classroom. It’s also connected to other recent research I’ve written about that has found poverty tends to contribute towards the loss of self-control and not the other way around.

I’m adding it this info to The Best Posts About Helping Students Develop Their Capacity For Self-Control.

Print Friendly

February 17, 2013
by Larry Ferlazzo
1 Comment

More Understanding Equals More Interest & Intrinsic Motivation

NPR had an interesting piece on this morning with classroom implications.

It was called Can You Learn To Like Music You Hate? A study found that the more people learned about music theory and how it worked, the more interested they became in music that they had previously disliked. Before, as the article describes, it was like “hearing a language you don’t understand” — just “noise.”

We’ve all heard students say, “I hate to read,” or “I hate to write,” or some variation. It’s not any great revelation to teachers, but it just reinforces that the greater the sense of self-efficacy, the greater the interest and intrinsic motivation. I’ve previously posted about other research that reached the same conclusion.

By the way, NPR had another intriguing piece on this morning that is worth a read — Control The Chaos With ‘Secrets Of Happy Families.’ It, too, has classroom implications.

Print Friendly

February 14, 2013
by Larry Ferlazzo
0 comments

It’s Official: “What Works Clearinghouse” Approves Study That Shows Relationships Promote Perseverance & Cash Bonuses Do Not

Earlier this month, I posted a fairly popular piece titled Surprise, Surprise: Study Finds That Relationships Promote Perseverance & Cash Bonuses Do Not.

It referred to a new study which found that high school seniors being mentored by college students were much, much more likely to attend college than if students were just given a $100 bonus to do so.

Thanks to Sarah Sparks at Education Week, I just learned that “the Institute of Education Sciences’ What Works Clearinghouse has just given this study its rare seal of quality approval.”

I’m adding this post to The Best Resources On The Value & Practice Of Having Older Students Mentoring Younger Ones.

Print Friendly

February 5, 2013
by Larry Ferlazzo
0 comments

Brain “Priming” In The Classroom

I’ve written several posts about brain “priming” research and how I apply it in the classroom, as well as some of my ethical reservations.

I primarily use it on days for standardized tests, and they’re all fairly innocuous (such as asking students to think and write for a minute about a successful ancestor). Also, even though some researchers have said that priming is not going to be successful if people are told in advance what is being done to them, I tell students ahead of time what we’re doing and why in the hope that they can apply these techniques to help them prepare for future high-pressure situations they might be in, like job interviews, and also because I just wouldn’t feel good about this kind of overt manipulation. I write about these ideas in my upcoming book.

Even though some researchers say it might not work if “subjects” are given prior knowledge of priming, more recent research related to placebos in medical treatment have found them to be effective even if patients know they are placebos (see my book for more information on that research), and it doesn’t seem like it’s that much of a stretch to apply those finding to priming. And, interestingly enough, I just learned about a big controversy going on in brain priming research which just may prove that point.

Apparently, though there have been a number of  successful replications of famous priming experiments, there have also been failed replications (I’m assuming that’s not that unusual in science). These failures have raised questions about if priming truly does exist (though it still has many believers, including Nobel Prize Winner Daniel Kahneman).

In one recently well-publicized failed replication of a famous priming experiment, one groups of people were given words to rearrange like like “bingo” and “Florida,” “knits” and “wrinkles,” “bitter” and “alone.” Another group were given words that had no connection. In the original famous experiment, the first group then walked down the hall slower than the second group.

However, in last year’s failed replication, it didn’t work at all — except in one instance. And that was when the group with the “slow” words was told that they were expected to walk slowly. Then they did.

I, and apparently many others who are far more knowledgeable on the subject than me, still tend to believe that priming works. But if we’re wrong, and clearly the jury is still out on that, telling my students ahead of time about the research seems to not only be the ethical way to go but a way that will also lead to positive results.

What do you think — am I missing something?

Print Friendly

January 31, 2013
by Larry Ferlazzo
1 Comment

New Research Shows Why Social Emotional Learning (SEL) and Character Education Are Not Enough

With my two books and constant blogging about Social Emotional Learning/Character Education, it’s obvious that I’m a big believer on its importance for our students. It’s critical for our students to strengthen their appetite for learning, their self-control, their perseverance, etc.

At the same time, as Mike Rose writes in the Christian Science Monitor, Character education is not enough to help poor kids :

…it is difficult for enrichment programs alone to lead to educational mobility. Children from poor communities need social policy that involves schools and enrichment programs, but also need programs to address the conditions that devastate students’ lives: poor nutrition and healthcare, inadequate housing, parental unemployment, violent streets, and a dysfunctional immigration system. When we ignore these broader conditions, we turn an ungenerous scrutiny on the children themselves.

Coincidentally, new research has just been published that backs up this position.

The research paper, Poverty and Self Control, takes issue with a common belief that many low-income people are poor because they don’t have traits like self-control. Instead, it finds that that poverty causes a loss of self control:

…the chain of causality is circular, and poverty is itself responsible for the low self-control that perpetuates poverty….policies that help the poor begin to accumulate assets may be highly effective…

Even though a large portion of the paper is highly technical, and not particularly accessible to a layperson like myself (and its PowerPoint presentation is not that much better), here’s my understanding of what they found….

If you don’t have many assets, and you’re used to the environment of living on the edge, then self-control really doesn’t offer that many benefits — as Janis Joplin sang “freedom’s just another word for nothing left to lose” — you might as well give in to your whims because not giving into them doesn’t really pay off based on your experience (instead of Joplin, the researchers quote Bob Dylan, ” When you ain’t got nothin’, you got nothin’ to lose.”)

On the other hand, if you have some economic (or, I’d suggest, non-economic assets, too) assets, and you’ve experienced the benefits of them, you want to work to keep them.

It makes sense to me, but certainly doesn’t negate the importance of doing whatever we can to support our students to develop these traits (though let’s not grade them, please).

But it does reemphasize the value of teachers, schools and families working together to push for the types of changes Mike Rose suggests in his piece, and I suggest in my book on family engagement, to attack the root causes of the challenges faced by our students….

I’ll add this post to The Best Places To Learn What Impact A Teacher & Outside Factors Have On Student Achievement.

Print Friendly

January 19, 2013
by Larry Ferlazzo
0 comments

How Do We Contribute To Students Being Rude In Class?

One of the chapters in my upcoming book shares ideas and lesson plans on how to deal with rudeness in class and I’ve previously posted about this topic, too.

The Harvard Business Review has just published a lengthy article
on rudeness in the workplace and, though I don’t think much of it would be useful to teachers, it did have one interesting finding:

Model good behavior
. In one of our surveys, 25% of managers who admitted to having behaved badly said they were uncivil because their leaders—their own role models—were rude…. So turn off your iPhone during meetings, pay attention to questions, and follow up on promises.

Just another reminder to us to remember the power of leading by example….

Print Friendly

January 17, 2013
by Larry Ferlazzo
0 comments

Surprise, Surprise: Study Finds That Relationships Promote Perseverance & Cash Bonuses Do Not

A new study found that high school seniors paired with college mentors to prepare college applications and financial aid requests resulted in a fifty percent increase in students who actually ended up attending college. They met weekly for a short time, and the high school students also received a $100 bonus. However, they said the money didn’t affect them at all — it was the mentorship that made a difference, and a control group that just received the bonus without the mentorship showed no difference in college attendance.

You can read a good write-up on the research results at Sarah Spark’s Education Week post, Senior Mentors, Not Bonuses, Boost College Enrollment, Study Finds.

This research is obviously interesting to me because of all my work in helping students develop intrinsic motivation.

But I now have an even keener interest in this kind of mentorship research.

Though nothing is definite, it appears that instead of teaching my usual double-block English class of high-needs students next year, I may instead teach two single period twelfth-grade English classes (populated to a certain extent with my ninth-grade students from a few years ago). If that happens, my colleague (and co-author) Katie Hull are planning to do some interesting and regular mentorship activities between my senior classes and her double-block high needs ninth-grade English class.

If it goes through and, as every high school teacher knows, class schedules are constantly in a state of flux, we plan on turning it into a teacher research project tracking attendance, grades, and other data to compare with a control group.

I’m aware of other research detailing the impact some version of mentors can be helpful to older youth, but am definitely on the look-out for more. Please let me know if you know of any….

(Here’s another related post from Annie Murphy Paul)

Print Friendly

January 13, 2013
by Larry Ferlazzo
2 Comments

The “Best Learning Techniques” Are Useless If Students Won’t Do Them — A Critical Take On A Well Done Study

(See Dan Willingham’s response in the comments)

I value and respect the work of Dan Willingham, the co-author of a recent well-publicized study on the effectiveness of different learning techniques. And I have equal respect for Annie Murphy Paul, who has written a widespread article summarizing its findings.

I have no reason to doubt any of the findings in the study. At the same time, though, I question its usefulness to many of us in the classroom for the same reason I have raised questions in the past about Dan’s critique of regular student use of explicit reading strategies (see How Reading Strategies Can Increase Student Engagement):

The “best” learning techniques are useless if students won’t do them.

Here’s how the study evaluated ten techniques:

Practice testing and distributed practice received high utility assessments because they benefit learners of different ages and abilities and have been shown to boost students’ performance across many criterion tasks and even in educational contexts. Elaborative interrogation, self-explanation, and interleaved practice received moderate utility assessments.

Five techniques received a low utility assessment: summarization, highlighting, the keyword mnemonic, imagery use for text learning, and rereading. 

I don’t feel a need to repeat word-for-word my previous post on reading strategies and engagement. But I don’t think the students in our school are that different from millions of others who face many challenges, including motivational ones, in — and out — of the classroom.  I’d suggest that the study’s list could be done in precisely the opposite order for showing how to help students successfully engage with what’s going on in the classroom.

I appreciate good education research. What I’d appreciate even more, though, is a little recognition that the perfect can be the enemy of the good.

Print Friendly

January 9, 2013
by Larry Ferlazzo
0 comments

JSTOR Now Lets You See A Few Articles For Free

This is good news for anyone who ever needs to do a little research — JSTOR, the archive of zillions of research studies and academic articles, will now let you read up to three articles every two weeks, for free. Up to now, you were out of luck if you were not affiliated with an institution that subscribed.

You can read more about it at Inside Higher Ed.

Thanks to Dan Willingham for the tip.

Print Friendly

December 30, 2012
by Larry Ferlazzo
0 comments

More Info On Student Cellphone Use In Class Research

Last week, I wrote about a new study suggesting that 94% of students use their cellphones in class for personal purposes (see The Best Posts On Student Cellphone Use In Class).

Reading, Writing and… Facebook? is a new article on the same study from Psych Central, and gives more details on the research. Here’s an excerpt:

About 94 percent of the pupils admitted to accessing social media or file-sharing sites, such as Facebook and YouTube, during class, from time to time or even more frequently.

Some 95 percent take pictures or make recordings during class for non-study purposes; 94 percent send e-mails and text messages; 93 percent listen to music during class; and 91 percent actually talk on their phones during class.

The researchers also sought to determine the frequency of the students’ cell phone use during class (from “never” to “very often”). The data indicates that on average, every pupil uses a cell phone in 60 percent of his or her classes, the researchers said.

Print Friendly

December 29, 2012
by Larry Ferlazzo
2 Comments

The Best Posts & Articles On The “Motivation Trumps IQ” Study

I’ve suggested that the recent study finding that motivation was more important than IQ in determining academic growth was the most important research of the year. Since I originally posted about it, a number of other news outlets have run pieces on its findings. I’ll certainly be adding it to my sequel to Helping Students Motivate Themselves.

I thought it would be useful to bring them all together in one post.

Here are my choices for The Best Posts & Articles On The “Motivation Trumps IQ” Study:

Is This The Most Important Research Study Of 2012? Maybe was my original post on the study.

Another Article On The “Motivation Trumps IQ” Study is a post I wrote about a TIME magazine article that provides additional information.

Study: Student Motivation, Study Strategies Trump IQ for Learning Gains is from Education Week Teacher.

Motivation, Study Habits Are Keys to Math Ability, Not IQ is from Psych Central. Here’s how they summarized the study:

Motivation and study skills turned out to be more important factors in terms of students’ growth (their learning curve or ability to learn) in math.

Memory work, or rote learning, was not a factor for math success. Factors that were associated with math achievement included: students who felt competent; were intrinsically motivated; used skills like summarizing, explaining, and making connections to other materials; and avoided rote learning.

In contrast, students’ intelligence had no relation to growth in math achievement.

“Our study suggests that students’ competencies to learn in math involve factors that can be nurtured by education,” said Murayama. “Educational programs focusing on students’ motivation and study skills could be an important way to advance their competency in math as well as in other subjects.”

Feedback is always welcome.

If you found this post useful, you might want to consider subscribing to this blog for free.

You might also want to explore the 1000 other “The Best…” lists I’ve compiled.

Print Friendly

December 26, 2012
by Larry Ferlazzo
0 comments

Another Article On The “Motivation Trumps IQ” Study

Last week, I wrote about a new study the reinforces what most teachers have experienced — that student motivation is the key to academic growth, not IQ (see Is This The Most Important Research Study Of 2012? Maybe).

TIME Magazine has just published an article on the same study, and it appears that they spoke directly to the researchers. Here’s an excerpt:

“Students with high IQ have high math achievement and students with low IQ have low math achievement,” Murayama says. “But IQ does not predict any growth in math achievement. It determines the starting point.”

So the children who improved in math over the years were disproportionately those who said they “agreed” or “strongly agreed” with statements such as, “When doing math, the harder I try, the better I perform,” or “I invest a lot of effort in math, because I am interested in the subject”– even if they had not started out as high-achieving students. In contrast, kids who said they were motivated purely by the desire to get good grades saw no greater improvement over the average. As for study strategies, those who said they tried to forge connections between mathematical ideas typically improved faster than kids who employed more cursory rote-learning techniques.

Print Friendly

December 25, 2012
by Larry Ferlazzo
1 Comment

“Share your Good News, and You [ & Others ] will be Better Off”

I’ve posted a lot about the value of encouraging students to be positive, and for us to do the same. You can find a collection of those posts, which include specific strategies I use, in My Best Posts On Why It’s Important To Be Positive In Class and in The Best Resources On “Gratitude”, and I write even more specifically about it in my upcoming book.

Today, Scientific American published an article reviewing the research that shows the benefits — to those talking and to those listening — of people sharing their positive experiences. Check it out at Share your Good News, and You will be Better Off.

The research in the article isn’t anything new to this blog’s readers — you can find all of it in my previous posts on the topic. But it is useful to have it all in one article. I did, though, especially like how it ended with an Albert Schweitzer quote:

“Happiness is the only thing that multiplies when you share it.”

Print Friendly

December 20, 2012
by Larry Ferlazzo
1 Comment

Is This The Most Important Research Study Of 2012? Maybe

Readers know that I do my best to follow new research and explore — and experiment — with ways to apply their findings to the classroom (or, in some cases where I believe the process used is ethically questionable and of dubious value, criticize them loudly).

In fact, I publish an annual compilation of what I believe to be the best research each year (see My Best Posts On New Research Studies In 2012 — So Far).

Last year, I also published a post titled “Is This The Most Important Research Study Of The Year? Maybe” It reviewed a meta-analysis finding that direct instruction was less effective than “enhanced discovery learning.” I still believe that it is a very important study.

Though you’ll find a lot of good research in my already-published 2012 summary, I think research that was just released today might be this year’s most important one. It’s titled Predicting Long-Term Growth in Students’ Mathematics Achievement: The Unique Contributions of Motivation and Cognitive Strategies. Access to the full report costs $35, and I purchased it so I could write my own analysis. You can also see a report in Science Daily summarizing its results here — Motivation, Study Habits — Not IQ — Determine Growth in Math Achievement.

The researchers followed 3,500 German students over a period of five years to identify which learning/teaching/IQ factors might contribute to immediate academic achievement in math and if they were any different to those that might lead to academic growth and improvement over the long-term.

And, boy, did they find some differences….

A quick summary is that, though extrinsic motivation and “surface learning” (such as memorization) might result in short-term gains in assessments, they actually hurt long-term (five-year) academic growth. The development of student intrinsic motivation, “deep learning strategies” (requiring “elaboration” and connections to other knowledge — I think that might correspond to the idea of “transfer”), and students feeling that they had more of a sense of control (though this last quality had a less consistent effect — it seemed to depend on grade level) of their learning were the main ingredients necessary for increased academic growth:

perceived control, extrinsic motivation, and surface learning strategies did not predict growth of math achievement, intrinsic motivation and deep learning strategies were significantly positive predictors of the total amount of growth (c16 = 4.51, p < .05; c18 = 4.64, p < .05). Again, intelligence had null relations with the amount of growth.

Here’s how they summarized the results:

One of the features of the current investigation is that we controlled for intelligence when examining the predictive relations of motivation and cognitive strategies. This is by itself of considerable importance, as discussed at the outset. In addition, the inclusion of intelligence as a predictor produced interesting findings: Long-term growth in math achievement was predicted by motivational and strategy factors, but not by students’ intelligence (after controlling for demographic variables). This stands in marked contrast to the commonly observed finding that intelligence explains a much larger proportion of the variance in current achievement scores, as compared to motivational and strategy variables (e.g., Spinath, Spinath, Harlaar, & Plomin, 2006). We should be aware that this study focused on the development of achievement in one academic domain only. Nonetheless, our findings clearly underscore the importance of paying attention to adolescents’ motivation and learning strategies when wanting to understand the development of their academic achievement. Thus, an intriguing message from this study is that the critical determinant of growth in achievement is not how smart you are, but how motivated you are and how you study. (Emphasis mine)

You can bet that next week I’m fitting this research into the copy edits of my sequel to Helping Students Motivate Themselves. Though it only focuses on math, it doesn’t seem to me to be that great of a stretch to be able to apply it to learning in general.

Also, see Another Article On The “Motivation Trumps IQ” Study.

Certainly, it reinforces a lot of previous research. And it’s especially useful that it specifically focuses on academic achievement.

Print Friendly