Larry Ferlazzo’s Websites of the Day…

…For Teaching ELL, ESL, & EFL

March 29, 2012
by Larry Ferlazzo
0 comments

Research Studies Of The Week

I often write about research studies from various field and how they can be applied to the classroom. I write individual posts about ones that I think are especially significant, and will continue to do so. However, so many studies are published that it’s hard to keep up. So I’ve started writing a “round-up” of some of them each week or every other week as a regular feature:

Bilingual Immigrants Report Better Health Than Speakers of One Language is the headline on a report about a Stanford study. Here’s an excerpt:

Healthy individuals who immigrate to the U.S. often see their health decline over time. A recent study from Stanford University suggests that immigrants who learn English while maintaining their native language might be protected against this puzzling phenomenon.

Ariela Schachter, a Ph.D. student in sociology, examined the correlation between English and native-language proficiency and Asian and Latino immigrants’ self-reported health status. The results, published in the Journal of Health and Social Behavior, showed that people who are proficient at both English and their native language report better health than do speakers of just one language.

I’m adding it to The Best Resources For Learning The Advantages To Being Bilingual.

Stress Changes How People Make Decisions is from The Association for Psychological Research. Here’s an excerpt:

Feeling stressed changes how people weigh risk and reward…. under stress, people pay more attention to the upside of a possible outcome.

This means when people under stress are making a difficult decision, they may pay more attention to the upsides of the alternatives they’re considering and less to the downsides. So someone who’s deciding whether to take a new job and is feeling stressed by the decision might weigh the increase in salary more heavily than the worse commute.

The increased focus on the positive also helps explain why stress plays a role in addictions, and people under stress have a harder time controlling their urges. “The compulsion to get that reward comes stronger and they’re less able to resist it,” Mather says. So a person who’s under stress might think only about the good feelings they’ll get from a drug, while the downsides shrink into the distance.

It’s a remind– for me, at least — that when a student is having self-control issues, there may be more than meets the eye.  I’m adding this info to The Best Resources For Learning About Teens & Stress.

Study Shows a Sliding Scale of Sleep Needed for Academic Achievement is from Education Week. I’m adding it to The Best Resources For Helping Teens Learn About The Importance Of Sleep.

Thinking Outside The Box, With Our Bodies And Our Brains is from NPR and reports on an intriguing study. Basically, some students sat in a big box and others sat outside of it. Both were given tests to measure their creativity. The students sitting on the outside were judged to have developed solutions on the test that were twenty percent more creative than those sitting inside. The NPR writer comments:

As an educator, I enjoy playing with these ideas. Aren’t walled classrooms boxes too? Would my students’ creativity flare to new heights if we met under open skies?

Print Friendly

March 24, 2012
by Larry Ferlazzo
1 Comment

“Bad Emotions And…Bad Feedback Have More Impact Than Good Ones”

I’ve written a lot about the importance of being positive in the classroom (see My Best Posts On Why It’s Important To Be Positive In Class). And here comes even more research that emphasizes its importance.

The New York Times has just published an article headlined Praise Is Fleeting, But Brickbats We Recall. Though I’d strongly encourage you to read the whole piece, here are some excerpts:

Negative emotions generally involve more thinking, and the information is processed more thoroughly than positive ones, he said. Thus, we tend to ruminate more about unpleasant events — and use stronger words to describe them — than happy ones…

….Professor Amabile said she found that the negative effect of a setback at work on happiness was more than twice as strong as the positive effect of an event that signaled progress. And the power of a setback to increase frustration is over three times as strong as the power of progress to decrease frustration.

“This applies even to small events,” she said.

If managers or bosses know this, then they should be acutely aware of the impact they have when they fail to recognize the importance to workers of making progress on meaningful work, criticize, take credit for their employees’ work, pass on negative information from on top without filtering and don’t listen when employees try to express grievances.

The answer, then, is not to heap meaningless praise on our employees or, for that matter, our children or friends, but to criticize constructively — and sparingly.

Professor Nass said that most people can take in only one critical comment at a time.

….As Professor Baumeister noted in his study, “Many good events can overcome the psychological effects of a bad one.” In fact, the authors quote a ratio of five goods for every one bad.

That’s a good reminder that we all need to engage in more acts of kindness — toward others and ourselves — to balance out the world.

One suggestion the article makes, which I question is that it’s better to start with criticism and then follow with praise. I wonder how much experience the researchers have had with children — or their parents….

Print Friendly

March 18, 2012
by Larry Ferlazzo
0 comments

Very Good Explanation Of Learning & The Brain

Mind, Brain and Education is a very good paper from an organization called Jobs For The Future (I’ve never heard of them before, but that’s more of a reflection on my limited universe than on anything else). It gives one of the best, if not the best, explanation that I’ve read about what happens to the brain when it learns something new. Though some of the “implications” of its findings seem a little shaky, particularly around second language learning, my quick scan of it leads me to think I can use parts of it with my students. So, I’m adding it to The Best Resources For Showing Students That They Make Their Brain Stronger By Learning.

I learned about it from Tom Vander Ark, who provides a good summary.

Print Friendly

March 14, 2012
by Larry Ferlazzo
0 comments

“Telling students it’s okay to fail helps them succeed — study”

Telling students it’s okay to fail helps them succeed — study is the title of a Valerie Strauss blog post about a recently published study. Here’s an excerpt from her post:

Telling children that it is perfectly normal to sometimes fail at school can actually help them do better academically, according to newly published research.

The results of three experiments by French researchers are not definitive but they are intuitive; kids who don’t feel overwhelming pressure to do well all the time are more likely to feel free to explore, take academic chances and not fall apart if they make a mistake.

Here are two other reports on the same study:

For Better Learning, Failure Is An Option

Reducing Academic Pressure May Help Children Succeed

I’m adding all of these reports to The Best Posts, Articles & Videos About Learning From Mistakes & Failures.

Print Friendly

March 14, 2012
by Larry Ferlazzo
0 comments

“Do E-Books Make It Harder To Recall What You Just Read?”

TIME Magazine has a very interesting article on a recent study comparing retention of information and concepts by students reading e-books and paper books.

Here is its conclusion:

…it may be that physical books are best when you want to study complex ideas and concepts that you wish to integrate deeply into your memory.

It’s a fairly lengthy article, and a more nuanced one than you would conclude just by reading that excerpt, so I’d encourage you to read the entire article.

Print Friendly

March 13, 2012
by Larry Ferlazzo
1 Comment

Krashen On Bribing Students To Read

In the next week or two, The Washington Post will be publishing a piece I’ve written about some recent examples of schools paying students cash for attendance and performing academic work.

While I was writing it, I revisited a well-known study by Roland Fryer that I’ve previously posted about (see The Problem With “Bribing Students” and More On The Problem With “Bribing Students”). One of the findings of that study that is often cited by supporters of this “cash incentive” idea was that paying second graders in Dallas resulted in “significant” gains in reading comprehension standardized tests and that a significant amount of that gain remained a year later.

Something about that finding always sounded fishy to me, but I just didn’t have it in me to plow through a nearly 200 page scholarly research paper. It’s also questionable if I would have understood what I was reading, either.

Fortunately, though, Dr. Stephen Krashen, the internationally-known language and literacy scholar, was interested and willing to analyze the research. Here is what he discovered in reviewing the section on the Dallas “success”:

Comments on Fryer, R. Financial Incentives and Student Achievement: Evidence from Randomized Trials Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126 (4): 1755-1998

S. Krashen, March 1, 2012

It is not correct to assume that this study demonstrated that incentives work and that the effect is lasting. Fryer (2011) paid second graders in Dallas $2 for each book they read and then passed the AR test on that book. Children were in general allowed to take each test only once, and had to score 80% or better correct to get credit. The duration of the study was one academic year. Students in the incentive program were compared to controls who were not in the program.

Incentives produced higher scores on the Iowa test for only one component, reading comprehension. Increases in vocabulary and language were not significant. When tested one year later, the effects were half that of the original effects and not significant.

This is hardly an overwhelming victory for incentives.

There are three major problems with this study:

The students were second graders. Second graders are not always independent readers. The easiest Goosebumps, for example, is at the third grade level.

They didn’t read very much: The average student earned $13.81. At $2 a book, this means that the students who got incentives read and passed AR tests on less than seven books during the entire year. And these are books for second graders, which means none of them were massive tomes. Is it possible that the comparisons read even less? (see below)

MOST SERIOUS. The incentive group did better than comparisons on one subtest, but we must ask “compared to what”? What did the comparisons do? The real question is whether an AR program with financial rewards is better than a literature-based print-rich program without incentives. Would children have done as well or better if they had just read the books without taking tests and getting paid?

This is the major flaw of all AR research, as I have argued in my reviews of AR research (see citations below).

AR has four components: (1) access to books, (2) provide time to read books, (3) take tests, (4) get rewards and the complete program is consistently compared to “traditional” instruction and is often (but not always) better. It is no surprise to see a program with all four components do better than one with none of them, but is this just because of the access and time dedicated to reading? Did the tests and prizes add anything?

There has been no attempt to see if components (3) and (4) add anything, no attempt to compare (1,2,3,4) with just (1,2). There is overwhelming evidence that the combination of (1) and (2) is in fact enough to produce excellent results, superior to traditional programs (Krashen, 2004), but the AR people have shown no interest in testing this simpler hypothesis.

Summary: Five out of six results were statistically insignificant. Only one was significant and the one significant result could have been because of more reading, not because of the tests and financial rewards.

Krashen, S. 2002. Accelerated reader: Does it work? If so, why? School Libraries in Canada 22(2): 24-26, 44.
Krashen, S. 2003. The (lack of) experimental evidence supporting the use of accelerated reader. Journal of Children’s Literature 29 (2): 9, 16-30.
Krashen, S. 2004a. A comment on Accelerated Reader: The pot calls the kettle black. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy 47(6): 444-445.
Krashen, S. 2004b. The Power of Reading. Portsmouth: Heinemann and Westport: Libraries Unlimited.
Krashen, S. 2005. Accelerated reader: Evidence still lacking. Knowledge Quest 33(3): 48-49.
Krashen, S. 2007. Accelerated reading: Once again, evidence still lacking. Knowledge Quest September/October. 36 (1); 11-17

 

Thanks to Dr. Krashen for identifying the flaws in this report…..

Print Friendly

March 13, 2012
by Larry Ferlazzo
0 comments

Update On Metacognition Study

Earlier today, I wrote a post titled Does Getting Better At Metacognition Physically Alter The Brain? In it, I described some interesting studies done on metacognition using MRI’s.

I contacted the author of the study with a question, Dr. Stephen Fleming, and he graciously responded very quickly. Here’s my email and his answer:

MY QUESTION:

Dr. Fleming,

I’m a high school teacher in California, and write a blog with over 25,000 daily subscribers — mostly educators.

I’ve recently learned about your research on metacognition, and have posted on my blog about it.

Helping my students learn about the physical impact learning has on their brain has had an important impact on them. I saw that in your 2010 paper on metacognition, which I write about in my blog, you found that people with a greater metacognitive function had a greater developed prefrontal cortex, but you weren’t sure if that was because it had developed because of their practice of metacognition or if they were just born with it.

Since 2010, have you determined which it was? As I write in my post, it would be a great asset for teachers if we could help our students see that their brains actually change as they practice metacognition.

Larry Ferlazzo

DR. FLEMING’S RESPONSE

Dear Larry,

Many thanks for your interest in our research, and for featuring our article on your blog.

Unfortunately we still do not know the answer to your question. There are two main challenges in carrying out this study. First, one would have to develop a reliable method for training metacognitive function in isolation of other changes in cognitive skill, such as decision-making, memory, etc. As yet I do not know of such a protocol, but would love to hear your ideas on this.

And second, longitudinal measures of brain structure and function would be required at different stages during the training. This is certainly feasible, but a caveat is that the field is still developing in its understanding of what different types of MRI measures mean for brain function. For example, we don’t know how the measure of structure we used in our paper (voxel-based morphometry) affects the functional properties of a particular brain region.

This would be a great study to carry out, and I would love to know the results!
In my own research, I am currently focussed on understanding the computations underlying metacognition at the individual level. Hopefully we can then use this knowledge to examine questions about differences between individuals.

Best wishes
Steve

So it looks like we’ll have to wait awhile for the answer….

Thanks to Dr. Fleming for his gracious response!

Print Friendly

March 13, 2012
by Larry Ferlazzo
0 comments

Does Getting Better At Metacognition Physically Alter The Brain?

I’ve posted a lot about the importance of metacognition, and how I try to help students recognize its importance and apply it.

The Wellcome Trust in the United Kingdom just published a report on a very interesting study on metacognition — Metacognition – I know (or don’t know) that I know.

It’s apparently one of the few studies done on the topic with MRI’s. They were able to identify metacognition with a small part of the brain. Here’s the most interesting part of the report:

The findings, published in ‘Science’ in September 2010, linked the complex high-level process of metacognition to a small part of the brain. The study was the first to show that physical brain differences between people are linked to their level of self-awareness or metacognition.

Intriguingly, the anterior prefrontal cortex is also one of the few parts of the brain with anatomical properties that are unique to humans and fundamentally different from our closest relatives, the great apes. It seems introspection might be unique to humans.

“At this stage, we don’t know whether this area develops as we get better at reflecting on our thoughts, or whether people are better at introspection if their prefrontal cortex is more developed in the first place,” says Steve.

Boy, if scientists find that practicing metacognition physically alters the brain, that sure would be a great addition to my brain lessons (see The Best Resources For Showing Students That They Make Their Brain Stronger By Learning).

The study referenced in the report took place in 2010. I’ve contacting Dr. Fleming to see if he has developed any further conclusions since that time.

Print Friendly

March 9, 2012
by Larry Ferlazzo
0 comments

New Research On Self-Control

There have been a number of recent studies and articles on self-control and willpower. They’re interesting enough to post here, but not useful enough, I think to add to My Best Posts About Helping Students Develop Their Capacity For Self-Control:

Is Twitter Really More Addictive than Alcohol? The Vagaries of Will and Desire is from TIME, and reports on some recent studies.

Can Teachers Increase Students’ Self Control is by Daniel Willingham and actually was published a few months ago. I wouldn’t say there’s anything in it that will be new to regular readers of this blog, but it does provide a good overview.

Where Does Self-Discipline Come From? is by Wray Herbert. It reports on an intriguing new study on self-control, though I’m not convinced it really provides anything that will be useful to teachers.

Lent and the Science of Self-Denial is from TIME.

Print Friendly

March 1, 2012
by Larry Ferlazzo
15 Comments

Can An Educator’s Clothes Affect How He/She Teaches?

I’ve previously posted on the topic of teacher’s attire (see A Question On Teacher Attire). In that post, I wrote about how I have worn a tie and sport coat every day I have taught (except for when we’ve gone on field trips). Here’s an excerpt:

Apart from weddings and funerals, and from seeing people wear ties on television and films, I may be the only person most of my students have seen wearing a sport coat and tie.

I think this kind of attire slightly elevates my authority in the classroom, so I believe it’s in my self-interest to continue to wear it. However, I’ve been trying to figure out what, if anything, students get out of seeing me wear these kinds of clothes. Okay, I’m the only one they see dressing this way — so what? I’d like to think there is some benefit for them, but I can’t think of one.

That post results in forty comments, and I definitely don’t get that many often.

I was reminded of that post, and that question, by a recent study that has been receiving a lot of attention this week. Researchers suggested that they had discovered “enclothed cognition” — that wearing certain clothes can affect how people think and subsequently act (they experimented with people wearing white lab coats):

“Clothes can have profound and systematic psychological and behavioural consequences for their wearers,” the researchers said. Future research, they suggested, could examine the effects of other types of clothing: might the robe of a priest make us more moral? Would a firefighter’s suit make us more brave? “Although the saying goes that clothes do not make the man,” the researchers concluded, “our results suggest they do hold a strange power over their wearers.”

I wonder if wearing a tie and sport coat affects how I teach and, if so, how? I’ve got to think about that one…

What do you think — does how you dress affect how you teach?

Here are links (in addition to the one I’ve already included in this post) about the study:

The Brain-Focusing Power of the Lab Coat

Does what you wear affect how you act?

Print Friendly

March 1, 2012
by Larry Ferlazzo
0 comments

Research Studies Of The Week

I often write about research studies from various field and how they can be applied to the classroom. I write individual posts about ones that I think are especially significant, and will continue to do so. However, so many studies are published that it’s hard to keep up. So I’ve started writing a “round-up” of some of them each week or every other week as a regular feature:

Kevin Washburn discusses several research findings and expands on them at What should we be teaching? I was particularly struck by what he said under “Initiative and entrepreneurialism” and am adding it to The Best Posts, Articles & Videos About Learning From Mistakes & Failures.

High Fluid Intelligence, Gestures, and Simulation is from the Eide Neurolearning blog. It reports on recent research on gestures and learning. I’m adding it to The Best Resources On Students Using Gestures & Physical Movement To Help With Learning.

Lack of Sleep Makes Your Brain Hungry from Science Daily is a report on recent research. I’m adding it to The Best Resources For Helping Teens Learn About The Importance Of Sleep.

Does being reminded of money make you an uncooperative jerk or an independent thinker? is a blog post by Daniel Pink on some a new study. Even though it’s not my post, I’m adding it to My Best Posts On “Motivating” Students because it’s probably the best place for it.

Print Friendly

February 18, 2012
by Larry Ferlazzo
10 Comments

Fascinating Study On What Learning From Mistakes Does To The Brain

I’ve written a lot about my classroom experiences with students on both helping them learn from mistakes (see The Best Posts, Articles & Videos About Learning From Mistakes & Failures) and helping them learn that their intelligence is not “fixed” (see The Best Resources For Showing Students That They Make Their Brain Stronger By Learning).

A new study, reported by Scientific-American, has found that believing that you can learn from your mistakes,and that you can learn through effort, has a physical impact on the brain. The study found that the brains of people with a “fixed mindset” acted differently from those with a “growth mindset” and that the stronger the belief in a growth mindset, the more pronounced the brain activity.  Here’s an excerpt:

From the data, it seems that a growth mindset, whereby you believe that intelligence can improve, lends itself to a more adaptive response to mistakes – not just behaviorally, but also neurally: the more someone believes in improvement, the larger the amplitude of a brain signal that reflects a conscious allocation of attention to mistakes. And the larger that neural signal, the better subsequent performance. That mediation suggests that individuals with an incremental theory of intelligence may actually have better self-monitoring and control systems on a very basic neural level: their brains are better at monitoring their own, self-generated errors and at adjusting their behavior accordingly. It’s a story of improved on-line error awareness—of noticing mistakes as they happen, and correcting for them immediately….

The way our brains act, it seems, is sensitive to the way we, their owners, think, from something as concrete to learning, the subject of the current study, to something as theoretical as free will. From broad theories to specific mechanisms, we have an uncanny ability to influence how our minds work—and how we perform, act, and interact as a result.

I’ll certainly be incorporating these finding in future classroom lessons…

Print Friendly

February 17, 2012
by Larry Ferlazzo
0 comments

Research Studies Of The Week

I often write about research studies from various field and how they can be applied to the classroom. I write individual posts about ones that I think are especially significant, and will continue to do so. However, so many studies are published that it’s hard to keep up. So I’ve started writing a “round-up” of some of them each week or every other week as a regular feature:

Learning a language may come down to gestures is a Washington Post report on a new study. I’m adding it to The Best Resources On Students Using Gestures & Physical Movement To Help With Learning. Thanks to The Center for Applied Second Language Studies for the tip.

Study: Gestures help language learning is another report on the same study.

How To See Yourself Through Others’ Eyes is a report on a new study that would take too long to explain here, but I think it’s very interesting. I’m adding it to The Best Resources For Helping Students See They Might Not Always Be The Best Judges Of Their Behavior.

Why we’re better at predicting other people’s behaviour than our own is another study on the same topic. I’m adding it to the same list.

The Business Case for Reading Novels is from The Harvard Business Review. It reviews research on the role of reading fiction in helping people develop empathy. I’m adding it to The Best Resources On “Becoming What We Read.”

Extreme Stress Could Shrink The Brain is from The Huffington Post and reports on some recent studies. I’m adding it to The Best Resources For Learning About Teens & Stress.

Print Friendly

February 10, 2012
by Larry Ferlazzo
2 Comments

Parental Style Study Makes Sense For Teachers, Too

A study just came out evaluating three different parent styles — “authoritative, authoritarian, and permissive.” It seems to me that what they found goes for teaching styles, too:

Authoritarian parents whose child-rearing style can be summed up as “it’s my way or the highway” are more likely to raise disrespectful, delinquent children who do not see them as legitimate authority figures than authoritative parents who listen to their children and gain their respect and trust, according to new research from the University of New Hampshire.

….The researchers evaluated three parenting styles: authoritative, authoritarian, and permissive.

Authoritative parents are both demanding and controlling, but they are also warm and receptive to their children’s needs. They are receptive to bidirectional communication in that they explain to their children why they have established rules and also listen to their children’s opinions about those rules. Children of authoritative parents tend to be self-reliant, self-controlled, and content.

On the other hand, authoritarian parents are demanding and highly controlling, but detached and unreceptive to their children’s needs. These parents support unilateral communication where they establish rules without explanation and expect them to be obeyed without complaint or question. Authoritarian parenting produces children who are discontent, withdrawn, and distrustful.

Finally, in contrast to authoritarian parenting, permissive parents are nondemanding and noncontrolling. They tend to be warm and receptive to their children’s needs, but place few boundaries on their children. If they do establish rules, they rarely enforce them to any great extent. These parents tend to produce children who are the least self-reliant, explorative, and self-controlled out of all the parenting styles.

What do you think?

Print Friendly

February 10, 2012
by Larry Ferlazzo
0 comments

Research Studies Of The Week

I often write about research studies from various field and how they can be applied to the classroom. I write individual posts about ones that I think are especially significant, and will continue to do so. However, so many studies are published that it’s hard to keep up. So I’ve started writing a “round-up” of some of them each week or every other week as a regular feature:

This study is a few years old, but it’s new to me. It comes via ASCD, and found that children above the age of twelve are more likely to learn from their mistakes than younger kids. I’m adding it to The Best Posts, Articles & Videos About Learning From Mistakes & Failures.

A study reports that students who set a goal of eating more fruit and visualized actually doing it were more successful than those that did not. I’m adding it to My Best Posts On Helping Students “Visualize Success.” And here’s a report on a study showing that people who visualized a job interview going well did better than those who did not.

If You Plan, Then You’ll Do… But It Helps to Have a Friend
is a report on a new study. It reinforces my having students identify goal “buddies” to meet with for mutual support. It’s also prompting me to think about having the buddies not only identify their goals on their own, but perhaps pick one that they have in common, too. I’m adding it to My Best Posts On Students Setting Goals.

Be It Resolved is a useful column in the New York Times by John Tierney. It talks about strategies to use in sticking to New Year’s resolutions, but it’s helpful for any kind of increased effort towards self-control. I’m adding it to My Best Posts About Helping Students Develop Their Capacity For Self-Control.

The Willpower Trick
by Jonah Lehrer reports on a new study on self-control that seems to reinforce the conclusions by researchers in the original Marshmallow Experiment:

Mischel discovered something interesting when he studied the tiny percentage of kids who could successfully wait for the second treat. Without exception, these “high delayers” all relied on the same mental strategy: they found a way to keep themselves from thinking about the treat, directing their gaze away from the yummy marshmallow. Some covered their eyes or played hide-and-seek underneath the desk. Others sang songs, or repeatedly tied their shoelaces, or pretended to take a nap. Their desire wasn’t defeated — it was merely forgotten.

Mischel refers to this skill as the “strategic allocation of attention,” and he argues that it’s the skill underlying self-control. Too often, we assume that willpower is about having strong moral fiber or gritting our teeth and staring down the treat. But that’s wrong — willpower is really about properly directing the spotlight of attention, learning how to control that short list of thoughts in working memory. It’s about realizing that if we’re thinking about the marshmallow we’re going to eat it, which is why we need to look away.

Print Friendly

January 28, 2012
by Larry Ferlazzo
0 comments

Research Studies Of The Week

I often write about research studies from various field and how they can be applied to the classroom. I write individual posts about ones that I think are especially significant, and will continue to do so. However, so many studies are published that it’s hard to keep up. So I’ve started writing a “round-up” of some of them each week or every other week as a regular feature:

Physicists Seek To Lose The Lecture As Teaching Tool is an NPR Report about the successes of a professor who has stopped lecturing and, and instead, has begun using small groups. American Radio Works has a more extensive feature on the results. I’m adding this to The Best Sites For Cooperative Learning Ideas.

Changing our Minds discusses a study and other ideas that suggest “fiction helps us understand ourselves and others.” I’m adding it to The Best Resources On “Becoming What We Read.”

Learning From Brilliant Mistakes and Finding Opportunity in Failures are both articles and videos related to Paul J.H. Schoemaker’s book, ‘Brilliant Mistakes.’ I’m adding them to The Best Posts, Articles & Videos About Learning From Mistakes & Failures.

V is for Visualization at Scott Thornbury’s blog is a discussion of research, and teacher’s experiences, of using visualization with language learners. I’m adding it to My Best Posts On Helping Students “Visualize Success.”

Print Friendly

January 3, 2012
by Larry Ferlazzo
1 Comment

Research Studies Of The Week

I often write about research studies from various field and how they can be applied to the classroom. I write individual posts about ones that I think are especially significant, and will continue to do so. However, so many studies are published that it’s hard to keep up. So I’ve started writing a “round-up” of some of them each week or every other week as a regular feature:

Seven ways to be good: 6) Form if-then plans is from BPS Research Digest and describes a study which found having a specific pre-planned strategy to deal with how you will respond to challenges to self-control increases the odds of successfully resisting temptation. Even though that seems fairly obvious to me, a little evidence can’t hurt. It reinforces the activity I have students do when we discuss the marshmallow plan — on one side of a paper they say and draw a potential temptation, and on the side they write and draw what they will do to distract themselves from following through on taking the action that know isn’t a good one. I’m adding this information to My Best Posts About Helping Students Develop Their Capacity For Self-Control.

Chewing Gum May Improve Test Scores reports on a new study that says chewing gum can improve test performance, but only for fifteen or twenty minutes after chewing stops. It says the gum should only be chewed prior to the test and will actually ultimately hurt test performance if it continues. This contradicts previous studies I’ve reported on and which can be found at The Best Posts On How To Prepare For Standardized Tests (And Why They’re Bad).

10 Novels That Will Sharpen Your Mind [Interactive]:And boost your social skills to boot is from Scientific American and builds upon previous studies I’ve shared on our “becoming what we read.” I’m adding it to….The Best Resources On “Becoming What We Read.”

Hearing about scientists’ struggles helps inspire students and boosts their learning is a pretty self-explanatory headline about the results of a new study. I’m adding it to The Best Posts, Articles & Videos About Learning From Mistakes & Failures.

Print Friendly

December 30, 2011
by Larry Ferlazzo
0 comments

Research Studies Of The Week

I often write about research studies from various field and how they can be applied to the classroom. I write individual posts about ones that I think are especially significant, and will continue to do so. However, so many studies are published that it’s hard to keep up. So I’ve started writing a “round-up” of some of them each week or every other week as a regular feature:

I’ve previously written a post titled New Study On “The Influence of Positive Framing” about a study that found “loss framed messages” (if you do this, then something bad will happen to you) really don’t have the “persuasive advantage” that they are thought to have. In fact, positive-framed messages (if you do this, all this good stuff will happen to you) are more effective, particularly in changing people’s health behaviors.

Here’s information on another study with similar findings, though they call it “gain-framed messages.”

The Benefits of Thanks comes from Scientific American, and gives a brief overview of gratitude research. I’m adding it to The Best Resources On “Gratitude.”

Solutions to Social Loafing is a report on forming small groups in classes that has some very interesting, if not unsurprising, findings. Even though it’s not one of my posts, the best place to put it is My Best Posts On The Basics Of Small Groups In The Classroom.

Print Friendly

December 9, 2011
by Larry Ferlazzo
0 comments

Research Studies Of The Week

I often write about research studies from various field and how they can be applied to the classroom. I write individual posts about ones that I think are especially significant, and will continue to do so. However, so many studies are published that it’s hard to keep up. So I’ve started writing a “round-up” of some of them each week or every other week as a regular feature:

Hearing about scentists’ struggles helps inspire students and boosts their learning is the title of an article about a new study showing that students who learned about the failures and perseverance of scientists became more interested in the subject and were more successful. It seems to me that it would be that great a leap to think a similar strategy might have the same affect in other subjects, too.

The Cognitive Benefits of Chewing Gum is by Jonah Lehrer at Wired. He reports on a study that showed test-takers chewing gum scored higher than those who did it — it kept the chewers more alert. I thought this was particularly interesting because the only other similar research I had read was financed by the Wrigley Company, which didn’t inspire a great deal of confidence in its integrity. I’ll add this info to The Best Posts On How To Prepare For Standardized Tests (And Why They’re Bad).

A rather complicated (at least to me) study found that high-performer physicians (those who appeared to most likely prescribe an effective treatment to a patient) were far more likely to pay attention to learning from their mistakes than low-performers. These “low-performers” were more likely to demonstrate confirmation bias and focus on their successes. I actually think that this study might be an important one, and I just need to set aside some time to review it again…and again until I understand it. I’m adding this information to The Best Posts, Articles & Videos About Learning From Mistakes & Failures.

Research Digest reports on research showing that clenching your muscles can be a useful support for self-control. I don’t think I’m comfortable recommending to students that they actually do that, but I have provided stress balls to some in the past and it seems to me that it works on the same principle.

Relationships Matter by Sean Slade is not a new study, but is an excellent compilation of studies highlighting the importance of positive teacher/student, family/school, teacher/teacher, and student/student relationships. I’m adding it to The Best Resources On The Importance Of Building Positive Relationships With Students.

Print Friendly

December 6, 2011
by Larry Ferlazzo
0 comments

Sorry, Professors: Deliberate Practice Matters

The New York Times published an opinion piece a couple of weeks ago titled Sorry, Strivers: Talent Matters by two professors. In it, they attempt to dismiss the claim popularized by Malcolm Gladwell that you can reach an extremely high level of skill in just about anything after practicing at it for 10,000 hours. The professors claim that innate intellectual ability and working memory capacity is a key determiner of success.

A number of other researchers have since pointed out that the column’s authors dramatically overstate what their evidence shows. In fact, 45% of improvement was attributed to deliberate practice and only 7% to working memory capacity.

I’ve used the 10,000 hour finding effectively as one way to help students see that it can be possible for them to achieve their hopes and dreams.

A lot of my students have plenty of reasons already why they might not accomplish their goals. Perhaps professors should double-check their figures before coming-up with even more….

Print Friendly