'busy walls of our second grade classroom' photo (c) 2010, woodleywonderworks - license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/

The media has been full of stories about a new study suggesting that bare classroom walls are a better learning environment for children than decorated ones.

In many ways, this research is a great example of some of the problems with much education research, much of which you can read about in The Best Resources For Understanding How To Interpret Education Research.

There are two excellent posts that elaborate on these issues — one by Alfie Kohn and the other by Dan Willingham. There’s some irony in this since Kohn criticizes a prior article by Dan in an effort to make his points:

The education question we should be asking is by Alfie Kohn.

Bare Walls and Poor Learning? The Trouble with the Latest Headlines is by Daniel Willingham.

Here are three other articles on the study worth reading, too:

Rethinking the Colorful Kindergarten Classroom is from The New York Times.

Study Shows Classroom Decor Can Distract From Learning is from an NPR station.

Heavily decorated classrooms disrupt attention and learning in young children is from Eureka Alert.

Here’s a new study with different conclusions: Quote Of The Day: The Importance Of Displaying Student Work

I’m going to end this post with an excerpt from Kohn’s piece:



The top of this chat has some interesting info on the study.