Disney’s new movie, Moana, will be opening later this month. As you’ve probably heard, it has a focus on Pacific Islander culture and also features music by Hamilton creator Lin-Manual Miranda.
The trailers seem very entertaining – to me, at least (see the trailer below) – and Disney is making a big deal of its efforts to connect to Pacific Islanders during the movie’s production and make it as “authentic” as possible (see the second video embedded below and this article).
It’s also come in for some criticism, especially for it’s portrayal of the demi-god, which some view as “obese” and “racially insensitive.”
I have a particular interest in the film because of the large number of Pacific Islanders at our school and in my ELL classes.
My suspicion, and I might very well be wrong, is that most will be thrilled by the movie. I think it will create lots of opportunities in multiple classes for English development, as well as for highlighting Pacific Islander culture in other content classes (Disney has a pretty extensive downloadable educators guide for the film).
I think criticism of the film also offers an opportunity to examine those points in class and solicit student feedback.
My response to the question posed in the headline of the post is that I think it will be an overall positive. Just as Clint Eastwood’s Gran Torino received some critique in the Hmong community, many Hmong (at least, my students and their families) appreciated the public recognition of their culture and we were able to use it for many educational purposes.
However, until I see if my expectation is accurate, I’ll refrain from adding this info to The Best Sites For Asian Pacific American Heritage Month.