Most educators have heard about John Hattie and his education research. I’ve shared many related resources over the years, and this first tweet by Scott Martin today prompted me to put them all together in one “Best” list (again, this are just resources I’ve previously posted in this blog – I’m sure I’m missing other good pieces). Feel free to suggest other additions (you might also be interested in The Best Resources For Understanding How To Interpret Education Research):
John Hatties updated 2016 effect sizes https://t.co/8iEMR9V9ip
— Scott Martin (@smartins3313) April 6, 2017
John Hattie’s Research Doesn’t Have to Be Complicated is by Peter DeWitt.
Hattie Ranking: 195 Influences And Effect Sizes Related To Student Achievement should probably be one of every educator’s “go-to” resources.
Making a Visible Impact is a useful article providing a good summary of John Hattie’s research findings about what works in the classroom.
— Philip Capobianco (@CapoOttawa) July 25, 2015
— Corwin Australia (@CorwinAU) July 9, 2015
Hattie’s 2017 Updated List of Factors Influencing Student Achievement.
TY @D4Griffin3 for sharing@newfrontier21 @mikemattos65 @unfoldthesoul @Larryferlazzo @lcruzconsulting @adamsteaching @MCUSDSupe @curriculumblog @burgess_shelley @ShanaVWhite https://t.co/FyTyKoQG6B via
— Dr. Rosa Perez-Isiah (@RosaIsiah) November 12, 2017
I have a lot of respect for John Hattie’s work. At the same time, I have a lot of respect for educators who have been sharing this article: A CRITICISM OF JOHN HATTIE’S ARGUMENTS IN VISIBLE LEARNING FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF A STATISTICIAN
— Andy Hargreaves (@HargreavesBC) June 23, 2018
— Visible Learning (@VisibleLearning) June 22, 2018
Here’s the latest of John Hattie’s 250+ Influences on Student Achievement.
John Hattie Answers Your Visible Learning Questions! is from Corwin.
— Matthew A. Kraft (@MatthewAKraft) December 23, 2019
HOW TO ENGAGE IN PSEUDOSCIENCE WITH REAL DATA: A CRITICISM OF JOHN HATTIE’S ARGUMENTS IN VISIBLE LEARNING FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF A STATISTICIAN is a thought-provoking – and critical – paper.